'I love that Mauricio Pochettino is advocating for us' – The USMNT has 13 MLS players on its squad, reigniting lingering debates about the league's place in global football hierarchy

This is the most MLS-heavy squad Pochettino has selected during non-January camps, just 10 months before a World Cup

Luis Robles thinks about it all the time. The former New York Red Bulls goalkeeper, who tallied 281 appearances in MLS, as well as a handful for his country, is constantly pondering MLS's place in the global football hierarchy. In some ways, he has to – not least because he leads MLS's youth soccer efforts in the United States. 

But even outside of his workplace, it is something he ponders.

What is the relative strength of Major League Soccer these days? Can it pip some of Europe's best? Does it lie just outside the global elite? That conversation has long simmered just below the surface, and crops up seemingly every time a new USMNT roster is released. Each squad is picked apart, and the presence of MLS talent – or lack thereof – dominating the dialogue. 

Yet this time, the conversation has intensified. Sure, the headline for the USMNT's upcoming friendlies against South Korea and Japan is the return of Christian Pulisic after a summer of chaos and controversy. The AC Milan star represents the best of Americans Abroad making an impact in the top leagues in Europe. 

Yet the subtext of the roster is also curious. Mauricio Pochettino went all in on MLS, justifying his decision to select 13 domestic players to his roster for a pair of upcoming friendlies – 10 months from the 2026 World Cup – by claiming that America's top flight might be better than some European setups.

"We need to give MLS the value because competing there, I think the players can show that they can perform in the national team," Pochettino said after announcing the current roster. "I think it's not necessary to move to from MLS to Europe, because sometimes the MLS – under my assessment – maybe is more competitive than some leagues in Europe. We have some players competing in different leagues that maybe are not so competitive, or in every single week compete in the same way that you compete in the MLS every single week."

And thus the debate has reappeared. Some big names in European leagues have been left at home. This is the most MLS-heavy squad Pochettino has selected during non-January camps, just 10 months before a World Cup. And it might just suggest that something is changing as the United States ponders its domestic league's position in the world.

Yet what, exactly, that means is hard to define amid a divided landscape.

"It may be better for the individual to go to a European setup. You cannot have a blanket statement," former USMNT star and current Apple TV analyst Taylor Twellman told GOAL.

  • Getty Images Sport

    'It's not easy to play in MLS'

    This is, of course, a complex debate that has always sort of simmered. The stats suggest that MLS is significantly behind Europe's top leagues. Opta's most recent relative power index had the setup as the 12th best league in the world – behind the English Championship, Belgian Pro League and Brazilian top flight, among others.

    According Opta data, the only real bragging right MLS has is being slighty better than Liga MX – perhaps a more realistic point of North American comparison. But from day one, Pochettino has reinforced the notion that he will be heavily supportive of MLS, and value the talent coming from the league. He outlined as such in his inaugural news  conference.

    "I think to send the message to everyone," he said, "not only the players that were involved in the last few games, not only the players that play in Europe, but the players that play here in the USA and in MLS, if not every single player that is around the world, we are going to try to pay attention and from now on they have the door open."

    He selected just four MLS players in his first squad, but has consistently increased the numbers since then. Such decisions have drawn plenty of talk – and some complaints – around the extended American soccer universe, with split opinions as to how, exactly, MLS talent should be valued, not to mention where the league stands at large. Pochettino has insisted that the physicality of the league puts it among the best in the world.

    "It's not easy to play in [MLS]. It's very physical – all of the players who have played here for a long time say 'Gaffer, it is very competitive.' They have very good discipline, they train very well," he said in November 2024.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    'It might shock people'

    And since then, he has added more-and-more MLS players to his rosters.  The January camp, of course, was MLS heavy, especially given the fact that it lands in the middle of the European season.

    But the current iteration was the crux of it all. A series of big-name European players – Weston McKennie, Johnny Cardoso, Malik Tillman among them – were all left off the squad, some due to injury. In their place, Pochettino went all-in on MLS.

    The word from the camp was that some Europeans had been left with their clubs due to a need to rehab and settle into the season. Some were skeptical. Some ex-USMNT players, for their part, insisted that MLS should be taken seriously. 

    Former USMNT goalkeeper Tim Howard, who spent the majority of his career in the Premier League, pointed out the value of promoting domestic football.

    "It's a silly argument. Obviously it's good that Pochettino sees how valuable it is. I know the value of both playing in Europe and an MLS. They're both important, it's about rhythm, it's about timing. So I'm OK with it," he said on his podcast. 

    Others have been supportive of the notion – and claimed that it speaks to a larger trend. Former MLS and USMNT star Alexi Lalas claimed that Pochettino's words can make a substantive difference. 

    “There is a part of me that is so happy to hear Mauricio Pochettino say this,” Lalas said on his State of the Union podcast. "Saying something like this… and saying it publicly is blowing minds. Because as we know, the MLS Derangement Syndrome out there shows no sign of abating. And so it makes me happy that he is being this positive about MLS and about MLS’ quality and about American players, relative to the national team that play in MLS.“

  • Getty Images

    'Case by case basis'

    But others have argued that the relative strength is irrelevant – and case-by-case player situations have to be made. In other words: leagues don't matter, players and playing time does. 

    "The conversation is, 'Why are you calling in MLS players?' And [Pochettino] is telling them 'I'm calling a player based on the competitive environment that they're in,'" Twellman said. 

    He argued that some players simply don't need to prove themselves to the manager at this point in the World Cup cycle.

    "He's not calling in Johnny Cardoso right now. That has nothing to do with Johnny Cardoso not being in his picture," Twellman said. "He wants Johnny Cardoso to be the best player he can be for Atletico Madrid, and in his mind, he's going to look at more players this last window before the final three or four."

    In some cases, that is true. There are some European players who figure to be part of the USMNT setup at the World Cup who are yet to appear for Pochettino. Folarin Balogun, who started at Copa America but has since struggled with injury, is one such example, as is Sergino Dest. Balogun knows that he has to perform this camp.

    "It was important for me to be back with the team. Everyone wants to make an impression. And I think that’s just natural, with such a big competition coming in 10 months, it’s important to leave your mark," he told reporters this week. 

    Yet there are some names that would seem to be fortunate to be given a chance. Roman Celentano and Jonathan Klinsmann, who share a combined zero caps, are perhaps further down the depth chart. Yet they have been included – something Howard questioned.

    "Like I'm saying Celentano, Klinsmann, you’re nowhere near the frame. So who are your goalkeepers? He has to start making decisions, so who are your goalkeepers" Howard said of Pochettino. "The guys in camp, they’re not going to be going to a World Cup. So, Matt Freese, Zack Steffan, Matt Turner, Patrick Schulte. Get those guys in a room and go, ‘Hey, I'm picking three from four of you. You've got 10 months to give me everything you got, battle it out.'"

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • (C)Getty Images

    'It's just competition'

    The players themselves have insisted that they don't care about the pedigree of the squad, and instead remain dialed in on winning. Tim Ream, who spent a decade with Fulham but now plays for Charlotte FC, said that global leagues become irrelevant when a national team is pieced together.

    "I think it's just competition in general," Ream told reporters.. "Again, it's one of those things where we don't really look at the roster and say, 'Oh, there's this many guys in from this league, or there's this many guys in from Europe.' To us, it's competition… You have to go out there and earn your place, and earn your spot."

    He acknowledged, though, that the team is aware of the debate.

    "It's talked about a lot, but it's not discussed in any way amongst ourselves," he said.

    Robles asserted that Ream might be a bit off the mark – but acknowledged that they outline a clear target.

    "It feels a little hyperbolic, but the goal is to get to that," Robles said.

    And some players are clearly cognizant of the changes. Goalkeeper Matt Turner sat on the bench for first Crystal Palace and then Nottingham Forest before moving to the New England Revolution on loan this summer. He admitted that part of the impetus behind the move was to get reps and force himself into the national team picture. For him, it made sense. Turner started at the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, but has lost the No. 1 shirt since Pochettino took over.

    "I'm going to just keep working hard, keep trusting what the coaching staff have said to me and sent messages to me, and then just hopefully be back in October," he said last week.

Arsenal striker search narrowed down to two-man shortlist amid bleak transfer realisation on Newcastle United's Alexander Isak

Arsenal have reportedly narrowed their striker shortlist down to two but their chances of signing Alexander Isak have effectively been ruled out.

Article continues below

Article continues below

Article continues below

  • Arsenal in search of new No.9
  • Striker shortlist down to two
  • Chances of Isak deal remote
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    The Independent claims that Arsenal have whittled down their striker targets to RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko and Sporting CP's Viktor Gyokeres. And despite the Gunners believing that Newcastle United's Isak would be interested in an Emirates move, a deal is seen as 'impossible'.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    The report adds that Sesko, 21, and Gyokeres, 26, would cost either £75 million ($99.7m) or under due to various clauses and agreements. Isak, on the other hand, is likely to cost well above £100m ($133m). Arsenal have been crying out for a new number nine in recent seasons and if they want to take the next step and end their trophy drought, a clinical striker is a must.

  • DID YOU KNOW?

    The Independent adds that Arsenal retain an interest in both Eintracht Frankfurt's Hugo Ekitike and Aston Villa's Ollie Watkins but their pursuit of Sesko and Gyokeres is much more advanced.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty

    WHAT NEXT?

    Before Arsenal can lodge a bid for either Gyokeres or Sesko, or any other striker for that matter, Mikel Arteta's team take on Newcastle at the Emirates in the Premier League on Sunday.

Duckett defends Root dismissal: Reverse-scoop to slip the same as nicking off

Centurion claims India remain “slightly wary” of England despite 322-run lead

ESPNcricinfo staff17-Feb-20241:17

Duckett defends Root for first-innings dismissal

Joe Root’s dismissal, reverse-scooping Jasprit Bumrah straight to second slip to spark England’s collapse on the third morning in Rajkot, should be viewed no differently to him “playing a drive and nicking off”. That was the argument put forward by Ben Duckett, who defended his team-mate’s shot selection amid widespread criticism.Root has played the reverse-scoop regularly in Tests since relinquishing the captaincy nearly two years ago and has largely been successful in doing so. His dismissal for 18 on Saturday was the second time he has been out playing the shot in that timeframe, one year after he fell in similar circumstances to Neil Wagner in New Zealand.The choice of shot drew immediate criticism, not least from the veteran journalist Scyld Berry, who described it as “the worst, most stupid, shot in the history of England’s Test cricket”, writing in the . “Root’s reverse-scoop at India’s most dangerous bowler, Jasprit Bumrah, wrecked England’s chances of winning this Test and this series,” Berry wrote.Related

  • Bats in the belfry as England prepare to live down their self-made image

  • Root's reverse-scoop exemplifies England's day of unforced errors

  • Crafty Kuldeep undoes Bazball in 12-over spell for the ages

  • Jaiswal's blistering century caps India's day of dominance

  • Ashwin withdraws from Rajkot Test because of family emergency

Michael Vaughan, the former England captain, wrote on X (formerly Twitter): “The skipper [Ben Stokes] doesn’t Bazball .. he plays the situation .. Joe is far too good to gift India such a cheap wicket 20 mins into a crucial day when they are down to 10 players .. Sport is about changing styles at the right time.”But Duckett defended Root’s shot selection. “Rooty’s a freak: he does things a lot of us can’t do,” Duckett told TNT Sports. “In my eyes, that’s the same as playing a drive and nicking off to second slip. Rooty plays that shot so well. I’m sure those people weren’t saying that when he was hitting [Pat] Cummins for six in the summer.”Speaking to the BBC, Duckett added: “I’m just gutted it didn’t go for four or six. I think he’s earned the right to do that. He has played that shot so well. I think it’s exactly the same as me playing a reverse-sweep and getting caught deep point.”Joe Root was caught at second slip, reverse-scooping Jasprit Bumrah•Associated Press

Nasser Hussain, another former England captain, told Sky Sports: “His dismissal sums up where we are with Bazball: it will thrill and it will frustrate in equal measure… The one thing Joe will look at is the timing of that shot. Ravi Ashwin wasn’t there – he was away for personal, family reasons – so they were down a bowler. [Ravindra] Jadeja is coming back from an injury.”Bumrah is playing three Test matches in a row and there’s talk of him needing a rest. Bazball is about being attacking, but it’s also about soaking up pressure. If you speak to the management, it’s knowing when to attack and when to soak up pressure… I think Joe will look at it himself. That’s what great players do and he’ll come back. He’ll be absolutely fine.”Duckett, whose 153 off 151 balls was the only innings of 50 or more by an England batter in their first innings, also claimed that India’s decision to send Kuldeep Yadav in at No. 5 shortly before the close on Saturday evening showed they are “wary” of England, despite their 322-run lead heading into the fourth day.”I think even sending in a nightwatchman when you’re 330 ahead shows that they’re slightly wary of us,” Duckett said, when asked if England were realistically out of the game. “We’re going to continue the way that we play, and if we get two or three blokes in on that pitch, scoring quickly, you never know what can happen.”Asked for a realistic target that England could chase, Duckett told the BBC: “The more the better. This team is all about doing special things and creating history. They can have as many as they want and we’ll go and get them.”

Former Spurs manager Harry Redknapp left 'stunned' after BOAT crashes into garden of £7m ‘dream home’

Former Tottenham manager Harry Redknapp was left “stunned” after seeing a boat crash into the garden of his Sandbanks mansion.

  • Veteran coach lives in waterfront mansion
  • Property boasts direct access to Poole Harbour
  • Injuries avoided after accident in strong winds
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    The ex-West Ham and Portsmouth boss spent £7 million ($9m) on the south coast property, with reporting on how Redknapp and his wife Sandra are building a “dream home” after demolishing the old property that stood on their plot.

  • Advertisement

  • AFP

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Their luxury abode sits on the north shore of Millionaire’s Row, in the exclusive waterfront Sandbanks area. Houses there boast gardens running down to the sea, with private jetties providing direct access to Poole Harbour.

  • DID YOU KNOW?

    While that could be considered an idyllic location, Redknapp has seen a £25,000 triple-hulled racing boat swept into his garden by strong winds. The vessel in question, which is named ‘Three Cheers’, is wedged under the pontoon at the end of Redknapp’s property.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty

    WHAT A SPOKESPERSON SAID

    A spokesperson for Poole Lifeboat said: "A 50ft trimaran was passing through Poole Harbour on passage. With no engine at the time, it got into difficulty and ended up aground and wedged under a jetty near North Haven Point. The lifeboat volunteers were swiftly on scene and found that the casualties were all ashore, safe and well and did not require assistance.”

India's inability to last the distance

India’s latest collapse at St George’s Park was the seventh time they were bowled out in 16 matches since the tour of West Indies in May

George Binoy29-Nov-2006


Sachin Tendulkar has scored 38 runs in three innings on the South Africa tour
© Getty Images

India’s batsmen are struggling. And it’s been that way for months now. The latest collapse at St George’s Park was the seventh time they have been bowled out in 16 matches since the tour of West Indies in May. In their last eight matches India have been scuttled on five occasions.Scratch the surface and you’ll unearth more dismal facts. On the tour of South Africa so far, India’s tenth wicket has fallen as early as the 30th, 42nd, and 39thover. In the recent tri-series in Malaysia, Australia routed India for 195 after 43.5 overs and West Indies dismissed them for 162 off 39.3 overs . Another debacle was on the cards had rain not intervened after Mitchell Johnson reduced India to 35 for 5 by the eighth over of the first match against Australia in the DLF Cup.Being dismissed in seven out of 16 ODIs is dire but the remaining matches aren’t a pretty picture either. In four out of the other nine matches, India had scores of 245 for 9, 217 for 7, 223 for 9 and 249 for 8 after 50 overs, and in their Champions Trophy match against England, they lost six wickets while chasing a meagre 126.At the moment India don’t have a single batsman in form. They just haven’t been spending enough time at the crease and sizable partnerships have been few and far between. Cricinfo analysed the differences between India’s golden run during the 2005-06 season and their woeful slump since the tour of West Indies up to the Champions Trophy. Their travails in South Africa are merely an extension of the same. The blame lies largely with the batsmen.

Grand stage awaits fitting drama

The Kensington Oval has been given an extensive makeover, and has also got back its famous bounce

Sambit Bal in Barbados27-Apr-2007


“In place of what was once an idiosyncratic, charming, informal, but fairly basic and increasingly decrepit stadium stands a beautiful modern structure, comparable to the very best in the world”
© Arup Associates & Christian Richters

We are sitting in one of the television commentary booths in the newly constructed media centre of the Kensington Oval and Franklyn Stephenson, described by many as the best West Indian fast bowler never to have played Test cricket, is recounting to me the best over of fast bowling he, perhaps anyone, has ever seen. There is a lilt in his voice and a sparkle in his eyes as he visualises Michael Holding turning at the top of his bowling mark.”I was sitting there,” says Stephenson, who played only eight matches in Barbados before being banned for joining the rebel tour to South Africa, pointing to the right of the Sir Garfield Sobers Pavilion, “and Holding turns, his chest’s puffed out, and he blows in like a breeze, his collar flapping, feet gliding, and the ball goes whoop! I am sure [Geoff] Boycott didn’t see it.”The routine is repeated four more times, Boycott playing, or just waving his bat in the air, and missing, before being put of misery with the last ball. “Wow, the stump goes cartwheeling,” Stephenson says, replaying the movement with his hand, “one, two, three, four … must have gone half way to the fence.””Pace like fire, maan.” The words that became a West Indian leitmotif were born out of the belly of Kensington Oval. If cricket defines Barbados, the Kensington Oval defines West Indian cricket. Or so it did for close to 50 years when it was the most fearsome symbol of West Indian invincibility. Between 1948 and 1994, when they didn’t lose a Test here. Between 1978 and 1993 they won 12 Tests in succession. In this period they beat everyone everywhere, but at the Kensington Oval, they beat them to pulp. Fast bowler after fast bowler ran in to pound the pitch, made out of the hard coral island soil of Barbados, and batsmen were terrorised, crushed, and paralysed out of fear.But when I ask him if that over to Boycott was the fastest he had ever bowled, Holding, who still looks like he can run in the way he did 30 years ago, shrugs his shoulders and shakes his head. “There is a bit of myth about West Indian pitches,” he said. “Kensington was fast, as was Sabina Park, but never as fast as the Australian pitches barring Sydney.” Sanjay Manjrekar, who scored a technically accomplished century here in 1989, concurs. “It had grass, but it was not as fast as it was made out be.”More than the pace off the pitch, though, it was the aura. A relatively small ground, filled by a drum-beating, conch blowing, rum-drinking, infinitely knowledgeable and quick-witted crowd created a coliseum-like atmosphere that added to the intimidation of the opposition batsmen. “We never felt we could lose here,” Holding said, “it had bounce which our bowlers enjoyed, but so did our batsmen who could cut and pull.”A lot has changed since. The fortress was breached most emphatically by England in 1994 and, since then, West Indies have suffered five more losses here against four wins, one of which includes the sensational Brian Lara-inspired one-wicket success against Australia in 1999.The square had aged and slowed down; in 2003, Steve Waugh called it the slowest pitch in the world and even the West Indians agreed. Australia batted first and scored 605, the West Indian spinners bowling nearly half of the 152 overs. The match-winner for Australia was Stuart MacGill with nine wickets, four of them in the first innings.The process to restore the Oval began four years ago when the West Indies won the bid to host the World Cup. The ground has been transformed since. In place of what was once an idiosyncratic (the square boundary on the west side used to be a straight line), charming, informal, but fairly basic and increasingly decrepit stadium stands a beautiful modern structure, comparable to the very best in the world. From the left of the media centre, a five-storey building with all the facilities you could ask for (apart from protection from the afternoon sun), till the end of the 3W’s Pavilion, it resembles Lord’s, but is free of the stuffiness. The pavilion looks inspired from the spaceship design of the Lord’s media box but is in fact far better. The roof protrudes and there is a glass barricade in the front, insulating those watching from the sounds of cricket.What’s the trade-off between modernity and tradition? There are those, like the Trinidad-based journalist and radio broadcaster Fazeer Mohammed, who feel the loss of tradition and intimacy. “It may have been quaint, too dilapidated and therefore too unsafe for the modern era,” he wrote, “but there probably will never be a cricketing atmosphere to match that of a full house for Test cricket at Kensington.”


Those like the Trinidad-based journalist and radio broadcaster Fazeer Mohammed feel the loss of tradition and intimacy
© Arup Associates & Christian Richters

But at what cost, asks Tony Cozier, the foremost West Indian broadcaster, one of three famous media persons after whom the new media centre is named. “Do you want broken wooden seats with nails coming out them? At some point, rebuilding becomes necessary and, while rebuilding, some things get left behind.” Wes Hall, another Barbados legend, also gives his ring of approval. Hall said his decision to play for Queensland was based on the fact that the old Gabba resembled the Kensington Oval. “But they have rebuilt the Gabba, so why not the Oval? I love the new place.”The new Oval, to be honest, bears no resemblance to the new Gabba, which is a bowl-like, enclosed structure. Kensington retains the openness, the stands have individuality and character. “One of the things we wanted to retain,” said Dipesh Patel, the lead architect of Arup Associates, the British architecture firm that designed the stadium, “is its Caribbean character.” So the place has been designed to allow plenty of light and air and retain an atmosphere of openness. There is plenty of fabric used in the roof to make the stands feel bright, and all the stands have space between them.The legends of Barbados – the country has produced 41 Test players, a record perhaps in proportion to its population (266,000 at last count) – have been given pride of place. In addition to the main pavilion, named after Frank Worrell, Everton Weekes and Clyde Walcott, there’s the Sobers pavilion, which serves as a beautiful dressing room for the players, with an open-air dining area. Hall and Charlie Griffith, the nation’s premier fast-bowling pair, have a stand in their name, as do Gordon Greenidge and Desmond Haynes, the nation’s most famous opening pair. And Malcolm Marshall and Joel Garner have got the two bowling ends.The capacity of the stadium has been increased to 28,000 to accommodate the World Cup but the 16,000-capacity eastern stand is a temporary structure and will be removed after the final to create a grassy bank with a pool that is longer than the size of the pitch. “It will provide an echo of the coastal landscape of Barbados,” Patel said.Most importantly, though, the pitch has regained its vigour. The entire square has been relaid under the supervision of Richard Edwards, a former Barbados fast bowler, and the ball, particularly in the first couple of hours, now zips off the pitch. Bowlers such as Corey Collymore and Charl Langeveldt have been able to get it up to the nose. But the pitch has also shown a strange proclivity to slowing down in the second half of the day, so much so that, during England’s Super Eights match against Bangladesh, it was unrecognisable from the morning. But Holding believes it will settle down to be a good Test match pitch after one season.It is difficult to imagine any other cricket ground more qualified to stage a World Cup final. It is the soul of cricket. It has a proud history, a rich heritage and a purity that can only be felt. Now what everyone needs is a contest worthy of the stage.

Twenty quick numbers

With the league phase of the IPL finally coming to an end, a look at a few key numbers

Cricinfo staff29-May-20081 – Number of wickets that have fallen on the first ball of an innings. No first-ball sixes, but nine fours have been hit.3 – Three-in-threes, or hat-tricks. L Balaji, Amit Mishra and Makhaya Ntini were the three to achieve the feat, two of which came in the final over of a match, and two for the Chennai Super Kings. Chennai also performed a team hat-trick in their final league game against Deccan Chargers.6 – The number of hundreds in the tournament, but none scored by an Indian batsman. Four have been by left-handers – Michael Hussey, Adam Gilchrist, Sanath Jayasuriya and Shaun Marsh – while Brendon McCullum and Andrew Symonds have saved some face for the righties. Also, four Australians.8.02 – The Rajasthan Royals have been the best bowling unit, conceding 8.02 runs per over. Kolkata Knight Riders are next with 8.05, while the Deccan Chargers have been the most profligate, conceding 8.70 runs per over, marginally more the Chennai’s 8.65.9.05 – Kings XI Punjab’s run-rate in the tournament, the best among all teams. Rajashtan are second with a run-rate of 8.72, fractions ahead of Delhi Daredevils’ 8.69. Bangalore Royal Challengers are the worst with 7.43.10 – Sohail Tanvir has toyed around with opposition batsmen during the tournament, taking a wicket every ten deliveries, and his 21 wickets has cost just ten runs each. Tanvir now has the best bowling figures in Twenty20 matches [6 for 14], and the best average, economy-rate [5.97] and strike-rate in the IPL [among bowlers to have delivered at least ten overs].Add 0.12 to the 10, and you arrive at Shahid Afridi’s batting average in the IPL. While fellow Pakistani Tanvir may be the toast of this tournament, the Player of the Tournament at the World Twenty20 last year has had one to forget.11 – Tanvir has taken two hauls of four or more wickets in an innings, out of the 11 in the tournament. Nine other bowlers managed one, while Tanvir, and hat-trick heroes Balaji and Mishra are the only bowlers with five-fors.16– The numbers of maidens bowled in the tournament. Also, the number of wickets that have fallen on the final ball of an innings.19 – Partnerships of a hundred or more, of which Delhi have five, Rajasthan four, three each for Punjab and Deccan, Kolkata two, one apiece for Chennai and Mumbai Indians, and none for Bangalore.20 – The number of sixes conceded by Piyush Chawla, while four other bowlers, including fellow legspinner Shane Warne, have given away 16. However, with 17 wickets each, the two find themselves among the top five wicket-takers.31 – He’s nearly 39, but Sanath Jayasuriya’s wrists and shoulders were still strong enough to clear the boundaries 31 times, the highest for any batsman so far. Inverse 31, and you get the most sixes hit in an innings, 13 by Brendon McCullum in his epic 158.33.88 – Left is right. Left-hand batsmen average a good 11 more runs than their right-hand counterparts, who manage just 22.69. However, that stat is obviously influenced by the fact that quite a few tailenders are right-handers.36.28 – The percentage of dot-balls bowled. Rajasthan have bowled the most number of dot-balls – 647 – while Delhi have played out the least – 451.46.56 – The average score at the end of a Powerplay, given the average run-rate of 7.76. With Shaun Marsh dominating at the top, Punjab have scored 8.79 per over in that period [averaging nearly 50 runs per wicket], marginally ahead of the 8.76 Delhi’s dominant top order have managed and way higher than Bangalore’s 6.50. Mumbai have given away just 7.09 per over in the Powerplay, while Chennai’s 8.25 in the most expensive.47 – The number of free-hits, but batsmen have managed only 93 runs off them. Only four have been hit for six, while eight have been carted for four. Yo Mahesh leads the pack having bowled five free-hits, conceding 17.50 – The runs teams have scored, on an average, in the last five overs. Kolkata have done marginally better, scoring 54, while Delhi manage approximately 46. Deccan have conceded nearly 57 on an average, while the rest of the teams hover near or below 50.74.12 – The average for Shaun Marsh, who tops the batting charts with 593 runs. Among batsmen with over 400 runs, Graeme Smith comes next, averaging 52. Marsh has six fifty-plus scores from ten innings; Gautam Gambhir has five from 13.204.34 – Brendon McCullum’s strike rate in the IPL. He is the only batsman in the tournament [among those with at least 50 runs] to have scored at more than two runs per ball.258 – The number of sixes hit in the V between mid-on and mid-off, compared to 323 fours – a good indication that batsmen have been able to clear the boundaries with ease.447 – The highest match aggregate, scored by Chennai and Punjab in the second game of the tournament.

Big fish, small pond

He may play for Canada but he’s drawing favourable comparisons with the big boys of international cricket thanks to his ability to clear the boundary at will

Faraz Sarwat05-Nov-2008

Cheema goes aerial in a recent Twenty20 game against Bermuda
© Eddie Norfolk

“When I left for the ground this morning, I told my family I would hit Shoaib Akhtar for a six today.” Not many batsmen in the world would begin their day with such a prophecy and then see it fulfilled, but then not many batsmen are Rizwan Cheema.The 30-year-old Cheema has taken Canadian cricket by storm – first by smashing West Indies around during the summer, and then demonstrating his immense hitting prowess against Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe in the recently concluded T20 Canada tournament.Associate countries are rarely blessed with players who have such an immediate impact on the team, but from the moment Cheema dispatched West Indies’ Jerome Taylor for his first six in a 61-ball 89 in his second ODI for Canada, there has been an air of expectancy around him.Canada has no shortage of cricket fans but the vast majority would struggle to name a single player in the national team. Cheema’s heroics have gone some way in building a following for Canadian cricket, but at the moment it is almost exclusively tied to his fortunes.The buzz he creates is similar to that which greets Shahid Afridi when he steps out to bat. It isn’t the expectation of a knock laced with deft touches, precision cuts or elegant drives; it is primal: the crowd wants Cheema to smash the ball out of the ground, and in his short career he has rarely disappointed.In the recently concluded T20 tournament, which also featured two of history’s greatest hitters, Afridi and Sanath Jayasuriya, it was Cheema who emerged the home-run king, with ten sixes – the most in the tournament. Cries of “Boom-Boom Cheema” were heard whenever he walked out to bat and the player admits to getting a kick out of it, especially with Afridi around.Born and raised in Pakistan, Cheema only ever played cricket at club level, which he sought to continue doing after he moved to Canada six years ago. “I love playing cricket, so I just wanted to find a team in Toronto that I could play for recreationally. I didn’t think that I’d end up playing for Canada”.It took a couple of years for Cheema to make a name for himself as an allrounder in the Toronto and District Cricket Association league, which besides being the best in Canada is also the biggest league in North America. While his medium-pace bowling was certainly useful, it was his tendency to belt the ball into orbit that really caught the eye of observers around the league.Following his exploits in international cricket, there are now a number of people in Toronto’s cricket circles who claim to have discovered Cheema during his earliest days in the league. But it wasn’t until 2005 that he turned in a noteworthy season, scoring 627 runs (with three centuries) in 14 matches at an average just under 50, and taking 24 wickets at 13.12. After a disappointing 2006, Cheema established himself as the league’s most dangerous batsman the following year with two big hundreds: 161 off a scarcely believable 61 balls (eight fours, 15 sixes), and an effort of 145 with 15 fours and nine sixes. It was clear that Toronto’s amateur weekend cricket league would not be enough for Cheema and at this point he certainly was on Cricket Canada’s radar, but eligibility issues stood in the way of an international debut until this summer.

“By the grace of God I know that I can make ten runs in an over whenever I want”

Canadian teams of the recent past were overly dependent on John Davison for runs, a tendency which has continued, with the burden now on Cheema. In the seven international matches he has played for Canada, Cheema has scored three half-centuries, all against Full Member countries. In that period no other Canadian player has passed 50 even once. Since his debut Cheema has only had one real failure with the bat, when he was dismissed for 2 runs in the third-place match against Zimbabwe in the T20 tournament. Predictably Canada collapsed, folding for 75 all out. Cheema however is loath to criticise his team-mates. “The players are all good, in my opinion, but I think they just need to be a little more confident.”When pressed if the pressure to do the bulk of the scoring for the team is an annoyance, his reply is typical. “No, not at all. In fact, I always tell my partner at the other end to just be easy and relax and not worry about the runs, I’ll handle that. By the grace of God I know that I can make ten runs in an over whenever I want.”It may sound cocky, but Cheema does not come across as arrogant, just someone who believes in his own abilities. And it is this confidence that makes him tick, whether he is muscling Shoaib Akhtar away for a low, flat six or charging out of his crease to clobber Ajantha Mendis out of the park.Fearless to a fault, Cheema admits that his targeting of big-name bowlers is deliberate. “Anyone can score a single off Shoaib Akhtar, but not everyone can hit him for a six. I like doing things that not everyone can do.”His 43-ball 68, scored off the likes of Dilhara Fernando and Mendis, was also pleasing: “I feel very good about the innings against Sri Lanka. It was amazing. If the team is good you feel better about the runs that you score. I feel happier after I’ve scored runs off better bowlers.”With Cheema in sparkling form it is unfortunate that personal reasons have kept him out of Canada’s squad for the West Indies Regional Tournament in Guyana later this month. Notwithstanding the bounty of international cricket this season in Toronto, playing for Canada ultimately means that opportunities to take on the world’s better bowlers are few and far between outside of the World Cup. But maybe not in Cheema’s case. There is some talk of IPL interest in him, which is simply astounding for a largely unknown amateur cricketer from an Associate country. If he does make it to India, Rizwan Cheema may not be unknown for much longer.

Method to the Twenty20 madness

It’s not all wham, bam, thank you ma’am; there’s a science to batting successfully in the shortest format

Aakash Chopra22-Oct-2009We’ve heard it ad nauseam: the Twenty20 format belongs to batsmen. Bowlers are more than bowling machines, serving up balls to be hit to all parts of the ground. If you go by the number of runs being scored in Twenty20, and the economy-rates of bowlers, you’d side with that opinion as well. But let’s look at this game from a batsman’s perspective as well. This is the first part of a mini-series on batting, bowling and team strategy in the shortest format of cricket. I shall be writing about bowling in the next article.Does the quality of the bowling deteriorate in Twenty20?

No, it doesn’t. But good and great bowlers still go for plenty because getting out, which scares the batsmen in other formats, is considered insignificant in Twenty20. In an ODI the top six or seven batsmen are supposed to bat 50 overs, so we see a conservative approach to batting, even in the Powerplay overs, but there’s no such responsibility in Twenty20. In any case one decent partnership is enough to consume the major part of 20 overs, and then the rest of the batsmen can go completely berserk. It’s astonishing to see the kind of shots batsmen – and in some cases even bowlers – pull off when they do not have the fear of getting out.More time than it seems

Let’s look at how batsmen prepare for and look at this format. David Hussey, a successful Twenty20 player, says that there’s more time in a Twenty20 game than one thinks. When a batsman walks in to bat and knows that his team needs nine an over, the natural tendency is to become adventurous from the first ball. But it’s not often that he can hit the first ball for a four or a six. Besides, attempting a big shot before he can see the ball properly would mean a greater risk of getting out and hence putting the team in further trouble. That’s where Hussey’s advice comes handy.You should give yourself at least a couple of balls before exploding. You can always take a couple of singles to rotate strike, and get the blood flowing in the veins. This, in turn, might also ease the pressure and help you assess the situation objectively. There are 120 legal deliveries to be bowled in every game, and if you can reduce the number of dot balls, the pressure that comes from thinking you’ve been holding up the strike and need to hit a big shot is drastically reduced.Balls at a premium
In Test cricket the batsman gets a few overs to get his eye in, in a 50-overs match he gets a few deliveries, but in Twenty20 it is only the matter of a couple of balls. That’s the reason why batsmen in the dugout are always padded up and glued to the game. Information is vital in a Twenty20 game, and hence a batsman, after getting out, informs the remaining players how the track is behaving and what the par score would be. Most batsmen, while waiting for their turn to bat, also make a mental sketch of the areas they would target while facing certain bowlers.

Twelve runs an over from the last three might sound extremely difficult, but 36 off 18 scoring opportunities doesn’t sound that ominous. If you can manage six hits to the fence in those 18 deliveries, you need only singles from the remaining balls

Since balls are at a premium, players who can hit boundary shots are valuable. You can only go so far with just rotating strike; ultimately you should be able to clear the fence.Calculated risk

While it is good to consume a couple of balls before going big, there are certain situations that demand a different strategy. For example, if your team is chasing over 160 runs, it’s imperative to go after the bowling in the first six overs. In such cases the strategy of the fielding team is to form a ring and bowl on one side of the wicket, which makes piercing the field along the ground extremely difficult. That’s why players like Brendon McCullum, Matthew Hayden and Virender Sehwag, who aren’t scared of taking the aerial route, are more successful in the Powerplay overs.It’s not easy to take singles when seven fielders are inside the circle; it’s either a boundary or a dot ball. Batsmen who manage to play with the bowler’s mind are also more successful than the rest. Gautam Gambhir does that effectively. He walks down the track regularly to get the bowler thinking, and then waits on the back foot for the short ball.Identifying the weakest and strongest links in the opposition bowling is important. For example, if it can be avoided, you wouldn’t want to go after Muralitharan or Daniel Vettori in subcontinental conditions. And in seamer-friendly conditions you’d like to play it a little safe against quick bowlers while targeting spinners.A stable base, and staying away from the ball
Keeping a stable base is extremely important when hitting a long ball. Kieron Pollard, Andrew Symonds and Rohit Sharma are good examples of keeping a stable base and head while hitting the ball in the air. Most batsmen, including myself, are guilty of losing the shape of the shot when we try to manufacture shots or slog, which eventually end up looking ugly.Since there isn’t much time in Twenty20, batsmen in the dugout are always padded up and glued to the game•Getty ImagesUnlike Test cricket, where the batsman is supposed to use his feet to get close to the ball, the batsman is better placed if he stays away from the ball in Twenty20 cricket. Staying away from the ball allows him to free his arms and also get under the ball to get elevation.Go-to areas
Every batsman must identify his “go-to” areas and shots, at least one each on both sides of the wicket. Once you have mastered these strokes, which could be over covers on the off and over midwicket on the on side, you either wait for the ball that can be hit in those areas or make room or walk inside the line to create that shot. Hussey says that one should back oneself, especially when it comes to hitting balls in his go-to areas. The idea is that if the first ball is bowled in your area you shouldn’t be afraid to go for it.Thinking in balls, not overs
Another thing that batsmen agree on is thinking in terms of the balls remaining, not overs. One must try to break it down even further. For example, 12 runs an over from the last three might sound extremely difficult, but 36 off 18 scoring opportunities doesn’t sound that ominous. If you can manage six hits to the fence in those 18 deliveries, you’ll only need singles from the remaining balls. Putting it that way makes it sound easier, yet we all know it isn’t; but it surely is slightly less difficult than thinking in terms of scoring two runs per ball.Twenty20 has also taught the batsmen to never give up. Even if the asking rate is 15 runs an over in the last five overs, batsmen have started to believe that it can be achieved.There can be a number of theories when it comes to batting in Twenty20 format, but it boils down to how an individual reacts to the situation when he walks in to bat.

What the semi-final contenders need to do

Delhi are already in the final four but five other teams are jostling for the remaining three slots. Cricinfo takes a look at what they have to do to qualify

Cricinfo staff19-May-2009Bangalore’s semi-final hopes depend on whether they beat Delhi•Associated PressTeam: Royal Challengers Bangalore
Points/ Net run-rate: 12/ -0.309
Matches remaining: 2
Opponent: Delhi, Deccan
Today’s game against Delhi is of huge importance for Royal Challengers Bangalore. They have two games to play and are currently sixth with 12 points and a negative net run-rate. A win will take them level with Deccan and Punjab. A defeat will not knock them out entirely but it will leave them needing to win their last match against Deccan and hoping that at least one of Punjab or Rajasthan lose their last games. Then it will come down to net run-rates. If Bangalore win both their matches, their semi-final berth is secure.Team: Rajasthan Royals
Points/ Net run-rate: 13/ -0.360
Matches remaining: 1
Opponent: Kolkata
Rajasthan’s qualification for the semi-finals is dependent on other results. The best they can do is to win their last game, against Kolkata, by a large margin to move up to 15 points and improve their negative net run-rate (NRR). If they do win, then they could possibly finish third or fourth in the league. The result of the Chennai-Punjab and Bangalore-Deccan matches will affect Rajasthan’s chances – it is possible that Rajasthan might not make it even if they beat Kolkata. If Bangalore win their last two matches and Punjab beat Chennai, Rajasthan will be fighting with Chennai for the last spot. If Deccan beat Bangalore and Punjab beat Chennai, both will be on 16 points and Rajasthan will again be fighting with Chennai for that last spot.The best scenario for Rajasthan is for them to beat Kolkata and for Chennai to win on Wednesday. That will ensure a place among the top four, along with Delhi, Chennai, and either Bangalore or Deccan. If Punjab beat Chennai, though, it gets more complicated for Rajasthan: they’ll have to hope Bangalore lose to Delhi but beat Deccan, so that Bangalore and Deccan are both tied on 14 points and lose out, as Delhi, Punjab, Chennai and Rajasthan will qualify.Team: Kings XI Punjab
Points/ Net run-rate: 14/ -0.423
Matches remaining: 1
Opponent: Chennai
By the time Punjab play their last game, against Chennai, Bangalore and Rajasthan would have completed their matches against Delhi and Kolkata respectively. Wins for both will have Bangalore on 14 points while Rajasthan will have 15, and the pressure on Punjab, presently on 14 points, to beat Chennai will be immense. Even if Punjab lose, they can still make the cut if Bangalore lose one or both of their matches, leaving at least two teams tied on 14. A net-run-rate scenario won’t help Punjab, though, since theirs is lower than Deccan and Bangalore, and defeat will further worsen the NRR. Realistically, they need to beat Chennai to qualify.Team: Chennai Super Kings
Points/ Net run-rate: 15/ +0.932
Matches remaining: 1
Opponent: Kings XI Punjab
A victory against Kolkata would have sealed Chennai’s berth in the semi-finals but they couldn’t manage one, making their qualification for the next stage less certain. Chennai, however, are in a better position than most of the other contenders. They are on 15 points, one ahead of Deccan and Punjab and two ahead of Bangalore, and have the best net run-rate as well. However their last game, against Punjab, is of vital importance. A win will take Chennai through. A defeat will push them lower in the table but they would still be likely to qualify third or fourth because of their strong net run-rate.Team: Deccan Chargers
Points/ Net run-rate: 14/ +0.265
Matches remaining: 1
Opponent: Bangalore
Deccan, presently on 14 points, play Bangalore in the last match of the league phase. The worst case scenario for Deccan would be if Punjab beat Chennai, taking them to 16 points, leaving Chennai on 15; if Rajasthan beat Kolkata to move up to 15; and if Bangalore beat Delhi to move to 14. In that case, Deccan will have to beat Bangalore to secure their semi-final berth. If Deccan lose to Bangalore, they could still make the cut, but they’ll need other results to go their way, and their relatively healthy NRR could bail them out.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus