Cricket world riveted by best-worst-batter-in-the-world contest

And when we’re not all agog for Trent Boult vs James Anderson, we’re waiting to see whether Jay-Z will bring Brooklyn’s finest PR skills to our game

Alan Gardner15-Jun-2022The conclusion of the IPL means we can finally turn our attention back to cricket for a little while – the apotheosis of which is, of course, the pursuit of glory in the Test match arena. Nothing beats the timeless verities of the five-day game, the crucible of white-hot competition between the greatest, most-skilled practitioners of our beloved sport.By which the Light Roller means the extremely important race to determine who is the best worst batter of all time.For those with a kink for tailender nonsense, England versus New Zealand has decent history – from Caddick, Mullally, Tufnell, Giddins and ignominy at The Oval to Monty Panesar swimming for his ground in Auckland. But the Trent Bridge Test, which, to be fair, had one or two things going for it, featured a slice of history to truly be cherished.Tallying up the most runs ever scored by a No. 11 is very much in keeping with the you-don’t-have-to-be-crazy-to-work-here-but-it-helps mood that sets cricket apart from most other sports. There don’t seem to be too many people keeping track of the most goals scored by a right-back in football, or most aces served in first-round defeats in tennis grand slams.But Trent Boult has, by his own admission, spent his ten and a half years as a Test cricketer slowly reeling in Muthiah Muralidaran’s record, finally getting there amid the familiar flurry of jabs, squawks and feints that makes his batting a piece of performance art. The whole spectacle could only have been bettered by the sight of James Anderson, who has spent almost twice as long on the trail of Murali, vengefully reverse-sweeping his way past Boult’s mark later in the match (and that could still happen in the final Test of the series).Frankly, it was a more innocent age when players could be so good at one aspect of their job that they were allowed to be laughably bad at another (while still allowing for the development of an appropriate hierarchy). The Light Roller was just about starting to feel better about the world when we heard that Nicholas Pooran had taken a four-for.

****

Cricketers, as we all know, love to take the positives. Your team might have spent five sessions in the field, and dropped as many catches, but hey, lads, the bum pats were on point. Now Ben Stokes, in his role as England’s Test captain, has moved on to talking the positives, too. “The message from me to everyone is to look to be even more positive than we were last week. Let’s just always try to be better,” he said ahead of the aforementioned Trent Bridge Test. “I don’t know how you make positive more positive but I think you know what I mean.” Hmm, yeah. Not exactly Churchillian, eh? Although it seems Jonny Bairstow got the message.

****

Well done to anyone who foresaw that Cricket South Africa’s next move on the “journey of rebuilding trust” with the fans would be to bring in Jay-Z as a consultant. South African cricket may have 99 problems but a PR link-up with a millionaire rapper’s entertainment agency ain’t one. “We are not bringing them in as cricket development partners. We understand that we are experts in developing talent and in cricket,” said CSA CEO Pholetsi Moseki, placing the definition of the word “expert” under all sorts of strain. But anyway, good luck to them. It’s a hard-knock life if you’re not a member of the Big Three. And while the self-proclaimed Eighth Wonder of the World might think lbw stands for Lil Bow Wow, cricket has always gone well with an empire state of mind. If they are not rolling out branded Hova covers next time it rains at the Bullring, then it’ll be an opportunity missed.

****

In the latest failing-to-read-the-room ICC pronouncement, chair Greg Barclay has had his say on how to grow Test cricket in the women’s game. The answer? You don’t. Never mind the climate of optimism around women’s sport generally, from increased professionalism, prize money and prestige; or campaigns such as “This Girl Can”, “Close the Gap” and “We Know Our Place”. No, no, ladies. The ICC knows your place, actually. “I can’t really see women’s Test or long-form cricket evolving at any speed at all,” Barclay said. “Men’s Test cricket represents the history and legacy of the game – it is what makes the game unique.” Keep sidelining 50% of the population and pretty soon that’ll be another reason why cricket is unique.

How many left-arm bowlers have taken more international wickets than Trent Boult?

And who played the most Tests without ever bowling?

Steven Lynch16-Aug-2022I was sorry to read that Trent Boult was winding down his international career. Has any other left-arm bowler taken more international wickets, apart, perhaps, from Wasim Akram? asked Bruce McKenzie from New Zealand

You’re right in thinking that Wasim Akram leads the way: he took no fewer than 916 wickets in international cricket – 414 in Tests and 502 in ODIs. Trent Boult currently sits in seventh place among left-armers with 549, but might yet move up, as he is still expected to appear in some formats. Boult currently has 317 wickets in Tests, 169 in ODIs and 63 in T20s. The other seamers ahead of him are Chaminda Vaas (761), Zaheer Khan (610) and Mitchell Johnson (590), while spinners Daniel Vettori (705) and Shakib Al Hasan (631) are also in front. Mitchell Starc is currently only four behind Boult, with 545.Who had the most innings in Tests, having been bowled in all his visits to the crease? How about the other modes of dismissal? asked Andrew Browning from England

Only one man has been out bowled in each of the five times he was out in Tests – the Nottinghamshire offspinner Sam Staples, who played three Tests in South Africa in 1927-28. Nine people have been out twice in Tests and lbw both times; no one managed three. But Reginald Hands played one Test for South Africa, against England in Port Elizabeth (now Gqerbha) in 1913-14, and was stumped in both innings. The unfortunate Hands was killed in the First World War; a tribute to him, instigated by his father, led indirectly to the tradition of two minutes’ silence to honour someone’s passing.The record-holder in this particular regard is the Sri Lankan spinner Milinda Siriwardana, who had nine innings in his five Tests, and was out caught in all of them.England Lions racked up 672 against South Africans last week. What’s the highest total against a touring team in England outside a Test match? asked Gerry Latimer from England

England Lions did indeed score 672 in their innings defeat of South Africans in Canterbury last week, but it won’t make it on to any records list as it was not a first-class match (both sides chose from more than 11 players). But for this irritation, it would have come in a close second: Harlequins (whose cap would soon be made famous by Douglas Jardine) amassed 676 for 8 declared against West Indians in Eastbourne in 1928. This was something of a recovery from 162 for 5: Kent amateur John Knott hit an unbeaten 261, while Nos. 7 and 8, Reginald Bettington and John Evans, both passed 120. The record by a county is Surrey’s 645 for 9 declared against the New Zealanders at The Oval in 1949, when Jack Parker made a career-best 255.In Tests, England piled up 903 for 7 declared against Australia at The Oval in 1938 (Len Hutton 364), and 710 for 7 declared against India in Birmingham in 2011 (Andrew Strauss called a halt when Alastair Cook was out for 294).Wasim Akram has 916 international wickets, over 150 more than the next left-arm bowler on the list, Chaminda Vaas•Getty ImagesI believe that Eoin Morgan’s 17 sixes against Afghanistan is the record for a one-day international. But is it also the most in any one-day game? asked James Rowley from England

Eoin Morgan thrashed 17 sixes in his 148 from 71 balls for England against Afghanistan at Old Trafford during the 2019 World Cup. That broke the existing record of 16 sixes in an ODI innings, shared by Rohit Sharma, AB de Villiers and Chris Gayle.One other man has hit 17 sixes in an innings in List A (senior one-day) cricket: Gerrie Snyman, during his 196 for Namibia against the United Arab Emirates in Windhoek in 2007-08 (this was not an official one-day international). But one man is well clear of both of them: playing for Western Australia against Queensland in the Australian JLT One-Day Cup in Sydney in September 2018, Darcy Short launched no fewer than 23 sixes during his 257, the third-highest innings in any List A game, and the highest in Australia.Who played the most Tests without ever bowling? asked Abhishek Kunjal from India

It’s probably not a great surprise to find a wicketkeeper on top of this list: Ian Healy played 119 Tests for Australia and never got on to bowl. But the men in second and third spots were outfielders: New Zealand’s Stephen Fleming played 111 Tests without ever bowling, and Andrew Strauss 100 for England. Healy’s successor, Adam Gilchrist, comes next with 96 Tests, ahead of the England wicketkeepers Alan Knott (95) and Godfrey Evans (91). Then comes Jonny Bairstow, who has played 87 Tests so far (49 as the designated keeper) without being given a bowling spell.The record-holder in ODIs is Kumar Sangakkara (404 matches). The top non-keeper is a tie between Herschelle Gibbs and Eoin Morgan, who both played 248 matches without bowling. Morgan is also top in men’s T20Is with 115, although for the women Alyssa Healy has so far played 132 for Australia, and Tammy Beaumont 99 for England.Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Stats – Ashwin-Iyer's rescue act, India's unbeaten record against Bangladesh

Iyer and Ashwin knocked off nearly half the runs of India’s target

Sampath Bandarupalli25-Dec-202271* – The partnership between Shreyas Iyer and R Ashwin, the highest for the eighth wicket in a successful fourth-innings chase. The previous highest was 52 between Inzamam-ul-Haq and Rashid Latif against Australia in 1994. The unbeaten 71-run stand is also the fourth-highest for the eighth or a lower wicket in a successful chase.Related

  • 'Phenomenal' Shreyas Iyer calms the panic down with assured batting

  • R Ashwin and Shreyas Iyer make it 2-0 for India in close finish

0 – India’s losses in Test cricket against Bangladesh, having won 11 of the 13 matches. Only three teams are unbeaten against an opponent, having played more Tests – 20 by Sri Lanka against Zimbabwe, 17 by New Zealand against Zimbabwe and 14 by South Africa against Bangladesh.49 – Percentage of India’s target knocked off by the Iyer and Ashwin partnership. It is the highest percentage of target added by the last three wickets in a successful fourth-innings chase. The previous highest was 48.1% by New Zealand against West Indies in Dunedin in 1980, when 50 runs came for the last three wickets in a 104-run chase.

74 – India’s total when they lost their seventh wicket. Only two teams have been successful in the fourth innings after losing their seventh wicket at a lower score – 54 by New Zealand chasing 104 against West Indies in 1980 and 59 by Pakistan in pursuit of 65 against England in 1984.42* – Ashwin’s score in the fourth innings in Mirpur, the highest by a No. 9 or lower during a successful chase in Test cricket. The previous highest was 40* by Winston Benjamin while batting at No. 10 against Pakistan in 1988 in Bridgetown.71 – Runs scored by India after the fall of seventh wicket, their second-most in a successful fourth-innings chase. India had added 94 runs for their last three wickets against Australia in 2010 during a one-wicket win in Mohali. The 71 runs by India are also the tenth-highest by any team after losing their seventh wicket in a Test chase.145 – India’s target in Mirpur, the third-highest successful chase for India in Tests in the last ten years. They won chasing 328 against Australia in Brisbane in 2021 and a 155 while also chasing against Australia, in the 2013 Mohali Test.

Bangladesh enhance their ODI credentials with dramatic Chelmsford win

The team will be pleased to see their young batters taking leading roles and the tail finally generating some runs

Mohammad Isam13-May-2023Bangladesh’s three-wicket win against Ireland on Friday was only their sixth successful 300-plus chase in ODIs. The elements that stood out in this pursuit were the younger batters taking lead roles, the long tail that finally generated some runs, and the timing of it all. In a World Cup year when they are trying to enter the tournament with confidence and enhance their credentials as an ODI outfit, Chelmsford’s show was the ideal batting performance.Najmul Hossain Shanto, whose position in ODIs was dicey not so long ago, cracked his maiden century in the format. Shanto’s acceleration under pressure, when Bangladesh had lost two early wickets in a 320-chase, was heartening for the Bangladesh fans. He had been subject to a lot of trolling in the last two years but ever since the T20 World Cup in November 2022, he has grown as a batter.Related

  • Andrew Balbirnie: Harry Tector can become 'one of the greats of Irish cricket'

  • Najmul Hossain Shanto century, Mushfiqur Rahim finishing see Bangladesh to victory

  • Bangladesh find a home away from home to breathe life into Ireland's series in exile

After the second ODI, Shanto, however, spoke highly of Towhid Hridoy who supported him with a quickfire 68. Hridoy is more of a newcomer than Shanto, having made his debut in March this year, and quickly grabbed a middle-order spot that’s so hotly contested between him and senior batters like Mahmudullah and Afif Hossain.Shanto and Hridoy added 131 runs for the fourth wicket after Shakib Al Hasan got out softly in the 17th over. Shakib and Shanto added 61 quickly but Ireland felt they had a big say in the game when Shakib got out. Hridoy, however, shut down that notion quickly.Shanto and Hridoy had the best partnership in this season’s BPL, including a century and three fifty stands. Shanto finishing as the BPL’s highest run-getter played into his growing confidence while this year’s BPL was Hridoy’s breakout season.”This win will definitely give us a lot of confidence,” Shanto said. “Hridoy’s intent helped my batting. He never seemed nervous. Our partnership served the exact purpose. We didn’t worry about the outcome. We tried to play our natural cricket. We hope that this type of cricket will do us good in the near future.”I certainly enjoying batting with him. We had some big partnerships in the BPL. We understand how we bat together. His intent is really good for the team. It puts the opponent under pressure. He doesn’t go away from his process regardless of losing three or four wickets. I think this is how we should play. Our mantra is to stick to our own processes and natural game in any situation, without caring much about losing three or four wickets.”Shanto said that he was pleased with his own effort although not being there in the end left him a little disappointed after the game. “I am very happy to get my first ODI hundred. I felt I batted the way I wanted to bat properly. I would have been happier to finish the game.”I didn’t think much about the cold weather. I reacted to the merit of the ball. I didn’t worry about the outcome. I tried to bat positively. It was a great wicket but there was some challenge to face the new ball.”Bangladesh’s bigger and more complicated challenge was to navigate the chase with four genuine tail-enders. Some may argue that Taijul Islam is still a decent batter, but he has no limited-overs credentials. Shoriful Islam, Hasan Mahmud and Ebadto Hossain are genuine tail-enders, so scoring 320 runs in 45 overs with the top seven seemed a bit of a tight spot for the visitors.Mushfiqur Rahim scoops it over the wicketkeeper’s head for the the winning runs•Andrew Miller/ESPNcricinfo LtdBangladesh needed another 63 runs when the last recognised pair of Mushfiqur Rahim and Mehidy Hasan Miraz got together in the 37th over. Mehidy got out when they needed 34 runs in the last 5.2 overs. But Mushfiqur got those runs with surprising help from Taijul and Shoriful.Shanto said that Bangladesh proved that they can chase with seven specialist batters but they needed a bit of luck with the TV umpire unable to find a good enough angle to judge Mushfiqur’s run-out, and when Mark Adair bowled a no-ball in the last over.”It doesn’t matter whether we have seven or eight batters. We have to bat with responsibility and intent. I didn’t think we had fewer batters in the line-up. We chased 320 successfully. We could chase 350 successfully.”We always believed we could win, seeing the wicket and conditions. We knew we could chase this target. We spoke about it in the dressing room. We needed the luck, so we got it through the no-ball and that run out.”Shanto said that Bangladesh will look to improve in the last ODI on Sunday, but he felt the bowlers did a good job for 39 out of the 45 overs. He also mentioned that they always discussed when to bring Mehidy into the bowling attack, before figuring out that Ireland probably could be countered with the offspinner bowling from a particular end.”I don’t think we bowled badly. The coach (Chandika Hathurusingha) mentioned that we gave six or seven big overs out of the 45 overs. Otherwise, we bowled well for 39 overs. The one who got the century for them, batted really well. I think there’s no reason to blame anyone. There’s always room for improvement, but the way the bowlers did here, it will help us in the future.”We were all discussing, including the captain, about when to bring Miraz into the attack. But there was more trust on Taijul . Then we realised that it was harder to hit a right-hander from one end, because it was big. They were playing well against left-arm spin. We believe in him. He bowled well. He is very helpful. We want a situation where anyone can bowl in any situation.”

Injury toll mounts, death overs a worry – Australia's takeaways from South Africa

Australia head to India for a three-match series ahead of the World Cup with plenty to ponder after a 3-2 series defeat against South Africa

Alex Malcolm18-Sep-2023

Australia’s injury list lengthens

Australia entered the five-match series missing Pat Cummins (wrist fracture), Steven Smith (wrist tendon), Mitchell Starc (groin soreness) and Glenn Maxwell (ankle) but were buoyed by the opportunity to test their bench strength before those players returned. All of those players still need to get up to match fitness and intensity in India ahead of the World Cup but Australia leave South Africa with more injury issues.Travis Head has a fractured hand and is in severe doubt for the World Cup. Coach Andrew McDonald confirmed after the final ODI that he is unlikely to be available for the first half of the tournament and the selectors have to decide whether to carry him in the squad or not. Sean Abbott has split the webbing in his hand and will be monitored in India.Ashton Agar played just one game in South Africa coming off a calf tear. It was planned that he would play more but he experienced soreness and missed the second and third matches of the series before heading home for the birth of his child and he won’t play in the series in India starting on Friday.Nathan Ellis (adductor) and Spencer Johnson (hamstring) aren’t in the World Cup 15-man squad at the moment but both are key back-up fast bowling options and both leave South Africa with niggles. Australia has five more matches before the World Cup to get players up and running but they also have to factor in nine World Cup pool games in eight cities over the course of only a month in the tournament proper. It is a heavy workload for even a fully fit squad.Related

  • 'We do need to execute better' – Australia's bowling under the spotlight

  • Why Marcus Stoinis has become an Australia new-ball bowler

  • ODI World Cup 2023 injury watch

  • Smith feeling 'pretty normal' after cortisone injection for wrist injury

  • Head's slim World Cup hopes to be determined back in Australia

Dismal death bowling

Australia’s death bowling was woeful in the last three games of the series and it is a major concern heading to the World Cup. Cummins and Starc were missing, while Mitchell Marsh was unavailable to bowl and Cameron Green missed two of the last three games due to concussion. All of those issues meant Marsh was limited in his options as stand-in captain.Agar’s absence was also keenly felt. While he does not bowl at the death, his middle-over skills can help build more pressure on opposition teams heading into the death overs. But even the experienced trio of Josh Hazlewood, Adam Zampa and Marcus Stoinis were mauled by South Africa’s middle-order in the death overs.!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();

They gave up 96 runs in the final 10 overs in Potchefstroom, 173 at Centurion and 113 at Johannesburg. It would be easy to write it off as confirmation of Cummins and Starc’s importance to the side but that would blindly ignore the form of Hazlewood and Zampa.Both returned career-worst ODI figures in the series. Hazlewood did so twice in back-to-back games. Australia’s catching was to blame in the final game with Zampa and Green both executing well only for three key opportunities to be grassed. But execution was the issue in the other games and Australia’s death bowling since the last ODI World Cup is not a strength. They are second-last for economy rate in the death overs over the last four years among the World Cup qualifiers, ahead of only New Zealand.!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();

Middle-order malaise

There was a stark contrast between the quality of the two middle-orders in the series and this is not a new problem for Australia. The absence of Smith and Maxwell meant that there was a need to experiment and Green’s concussion in game one did not help their cause in terms of bedding down roles ahead of the World Cup.The middle and lower-order capitulated in every game barring the Marnus Labuschagne-Ashton Agar partnership in game one after the top-order collapsed, and the collapses came against both spin and pace across the series. In Potchefstroom, they were 140 for 1 in the 15th over and were bowled out 227. Even in the game two win in Bloemfontein Australia were 343 for 3 with 43 balls to go and lost 5 for 49.Even more troubling are the overall returns of Australia’s middle-order batters in the last four years. Only Pakistan, Netherlands and Afghanistan have lower averages in the middle-order, and only Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have a lower strike-rate of the teams with better averages.!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();

Two of Australia’s major middle-order pillars in that time have been Alex Carey and Stoinis and both have been short on runs. Carey did find some form with an outstanding 99 in a losing cause at Centurion but his next highest score in the series was 12. He has averaged 30.64 at a strike-rate of only 86.75 since the last World Cup where he was one of Australia’s best players. Stoinis’ returns with the bat have been bleak in the same period, even including the 2019 World Cup. He has not made an ODI half-century in his last 31 ODI innings dating back to March 2019, and has averaged just 16.37.Stoinis has bowled well in ODIs this year, particularly with the new ball but it has reached a point now where if he is not available to bowl due to a need to be rested, as was the case in two of the five games in this series, he is not in Australia’s best XI. Labuschagne was not in World Cup calculations ahead of the series but he has been Australia’s most prolific ODI middle-order player over the last four years. He enhanced his reputation with 80 not out and 124 in the first two games of the series and could well force his way into the final World Cup squad with Head’s untimely injury.But even with Labuschange’s improved intent, there is a lack of firepower if Smith, Labuschagne and Carey occupy three spots from No.3-7 when compared with what South Africa’s middle-order of Rassie van der Dussen, Aiden Markram, Heinrich Klaasen and David Miller delivered in this series.

Structure of the best XI now in a state of flux

Australia wanted to have three combinations that could all be used during the World Cup. One option was to play with eight batters, including four allrounders, and three specialist bowlers. The other two options were using seven batters and four bowlers, alternating between playing two quicks and two spinners or three quicks and one spinner.But the cumulative effect of all the issues leaves holes in all three combinations. Agar’s fitness and absence in the lead-up to the World Cup means playing two spinners might not be an option. Even if he is fit, it would mean leaving out one of captain Cummins or Hazlewood if Starc is locked in as the first-choice quick.Playing three quicks would be a risk on certain surfaces in India, and that risk is compounded if neither Maxwell or Head are fit to play and able to contribute with their off-spin. Playing eight batters and four all-rounders does strengthen the batting in theory. But the form of the middle order is still a concern, and it leaves Australia exposed with the ball at the death, like they were in South Africa.

Mitchell Santner is flying the flag for fingerspin

The New Zealand left-armer talks about his new ball – the Claw – bowling to lefties, and how his time at Chennai Super Kings will help him in the World Cup

Deivarayan Muthu04-Sep-2023In this age of mystery spin and quick wristspin, there are still some capable fingerspinners who are fighting the tide. Among them, Mitchell Santner stands out for his remarkable control, despite having spent most of his career on the easy-paced bash-through-the-line pitches on small grounds in New Zealand.Mohammad Nabi (4.29), Shakib Al Hasan (4.44) and Mehidy Hasan Miraz (4.70) all have better career economy rates than Santner (4.87) in ODI cricket, but they’ve all been bred on spin-friendly tracks in the subcontinent. That Santner is keeping pace with these fingerspinners – and even some wristspinners – is a credit to his defensive skills.So what’s on Santner’s mind when he is at the top of his mark, preparing to bowl to big hitters in ODI cricket?Related

  • How Santner slows it up to get the drop on batters

  • Back in fashion: fingerspin's resurgence in ODIs

  • Mitchell Santner: 'I watched a lot of Vettori. I thought I'd give it a crack'

  • Santner flexes his muscles as New Zealand strengthen their spin stocks

  • Santner keeps fingerspin flag flying in the land of wristspin

“I guess in recent times in one-day cricket, everyone is coming out quite hot with the bat,” he says. “We’ve seen some bigger scores, and it can be quite challenging at times for bowling. Our recent [bilateral] series in India was an example of that – where scores were 350-plus, and it makes a massive difference only having four men out vs five [between overs 11-40].”One [extra] guy you’ve got to have up [in the circle] and it’s usually a cow [midwicket] to the right-hander or mid-off to a left-hander. We know that the bowling style isn’t too different between T20 cricket and ODI cricket at the moment. You get a couple of dots, and you know the batsman wants to try some stuff and you try to build the pressure the same way.Santner says the strategy changes depending on the pitch he is bowling on. “You’re going to get a few more dots in one-day cricket, depending upon the surface. But if there’s a little bit there, you can probably be a bit more attacking. If it is a very flat wicket, like it could be in some of the World Cup games [in India], you have to be a bit more defensive and try to get wickets through false shots.”Santner used to be a left-arm seamer until he was about 15. Inspired by Daniel Vettori, he belatedly switched to left-arm fingerspin. When he was 17 or so, he suffered a back injury and he returned to action with a stiff non-bowling arm. The little pause in his bowling action and the effort he puts into reading the batter’s intention have helped him gain an advantage, though he isn’t a big turner of the ball.3:14

Mitchell Santner: ‘We’ve got our fast bowling and spin sorted for the World Cup’

“If you talk to some of the other bowlers, they try to probably look at some spot on the pitch. I try to watch the batter the whole time. The little delay [in my action] helps me if they’re going to charge at me or try something… At times, especially when it’s flat or if I think the batsman is going to do something, I watch him even harder. And at times, if it’s spinning, I might just bowl my best ball – the one that spins – and see what happens.”It has become increasingly difficult for left-arm fingerspinners to operate against left-hand batters in white-ball cricket. Colin Munro, a former New Zealand team-mate of Santner’s and currently a freelancer, recently spoke about playing Bazball-style cricket against left-arm fingerspinners. He talked about how Brendon McCullum, who was a mentor of sorts to him, spoke about picking match-ups. “If the left-arm spinner comes on to a left-hand batter, take him down. Don’t just get ten runs in the over; if you can get 18, it accelerates the game.”These days, even right-hand batters are switching into left-handers to spook left-arm spinners. For instance, in his first full season at Wellington Firebirds, Finn Allen switched his stance and monstered Santner into the grass banks beyond midwicket at the Basin Reserve. Santner says in these situations he tries to watch the batter’s feet and movements even more carefully than usual, and to vary his pace even more.”With the nature of these pitches being flatter and a lot of T20 cricket [being played], people are being very aggressive in ODI cricket. [As a bowler] there are times to attack and there will be times to defend as well, so being able to watch the batter is massive… see when the guy is going to switch [-hit] or run down.”With the lefties, you have to try and vary your pace [more] and maybe bowl a few variations to try to keep it away [from them]. Being a left-hand batter, if a left-arm spinner comes on, I try to take him down as well. So, it’s obviously vice-versa when I’m bowling.”Santner is also planning to use his version of the carrom ball, “the Claw”, to counter left-hand batters on particularly placid pitches in the World Cup. He recently flicked it out during his T20 stint with Worcestershire Rapids in the Blast in England.On bowling with Ish Sodhi: “We have a very good relationship, so we talk about different roles between each of us. If it’s spinning, we could do it [attack] together and at times we might both have to defend, depending upon the conditions”•Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images”I think it’s definitely an option to some left-handers. Something that just goes away from the left-hander has been so effective. I know [R] Ashwin uses it a lot against right-handers as well, so just some variation outside of the natural stuff to keep the batsmen guessing, especially when the pitches are flat.”Santner usually dovetails beautifully with legspinner Ish Sodhi, and their partnership will once again be crucial to New Zealand’s success in India. They combined spectacularly to spin India out for 79 in Nagpur in the T20 World Cup in 2016 and have both grown in stature since. New Zealand also have other options in Rachin Ravindra (another left-arm spinner) and Glenn Phillips (part-time offspinner).”Me and Ish have done it for a very long time,” Santner says. “We have a very good relationship, so we talk about different roles between each of us. It might be on me to tie up one end and he can be more aggressive at the other. If it’s spinning, we could do it [attack] together and at times we might both have to defend, depending upon the conditions.”In New Zealand, you might just go for one spinner every now and then, but in the World Cup in India, you might see at least two.”Michael Bracewell’s injury has stripped New Zealand of batting depth, but Santner’s improved power-hitting could help make up for that. Some of that power was on display when he cracked 64 off 46 balls at No. 3 for Worcestershire against Derbyshire in July.”Yeah, it’s been nice to get some opportunities [to bat up the order]. When you’re playing a lot for New Zealand, you’re kind of coming at the end. With our top order and middle order, we’ve got quite a good line-up, so you don’t get that much opportunity. It’s nice to go back and play for ND [Northern Districts] and get some more batting opportunities and then with Worcestershire. Michael Bracewell got injured, which wasn’t ideal for us, but it was an opportunity for me to go from No. 5 to No. 3, which was nice. Batting in the powerplay is definitely different to batting at the end. The more I can bank those experiences, and have good opportunities with the bat, the better.”Santner has been working on his batting ahead of the World Cup and worked with power-hitter Albie Morkel while playing in MLC in the USA•Dan Mullan/Getty Images”I think we’ve seen in one-day cricket, but especially in T20 cricket, power-hitting at the end of an innings – or even throughout the innings – is so important. We had Albie Morkel [assistant coach] with the Texas Super Kings [in MLC, the US-based T20 league] who was a very good exponent of that in his time. It was nice to work with him for a little bit as well.”More recently, on his Hundred debut for Southern Brave in August, Santner made an immediate impact, taking the new ball and giving away only 20 runs in his four sets, handcuffing Jos Buttler and Phil Salt with his subtle variations.Santner also fronted up to take the newish ball in MLC. He could perhaps do a similar job for New Zealand in their two World Cup games in Chennai, which is also his home base in the IPL.”The nature of playing leagues is, you come up against some of the best players and you’re likely to play them in these World Cups coming up. You get more of an understanding about each person playing and the conditions.”The IPL has been so good for that. You play a lot of games in India on some pretty good pitches – some slightly slower and some that can go through. Having that understanding of what you think batters are going to do and pitches are going to do is a massive one. Adapting on the day might be slightly different and you have to keep your options open when you’re out there.”Santner’s first introduction to the World Cup was through footage of the 1992 edition, when New Zealand bossed their way to the semi-final. Dipak Patel was New Zealand’s trump card at the time with his cagey fingerspin on small grounds with fielding restrictions in place. After that Vettori did that job for New Zealand, and though the landscape of the game has changed vastly since, Santner has taken over and continues to show the way for fingerspinners.

Time for ICC to overhaul 15-man squad limit amid spate of injuries

Plight of teams like New Zealand, Australia and Sri Lanka throws spotlight on restrictions

Matt Roller02-Nov-20232:07

Have New Zealand been unlucky?

Picture the scene: two of France’s centre-backs have gone down with niggles, so a third is summoned halfway across the world 48 hours before a vital FIFA World Cup match. “We couldn’t risk being a defender down for Saturday,” explains Didier Deschamps, their manager, while awaiting scan results for his first-choice pairing.The idea seems anachronistic, not least in a sport that allows squads of up to 26 players at its World Cup. Yet it is exactly the situation facing New Zealand at the Cricket World Cup after Lockie Ferguson and Matt Henry’s injuries left them with no choice but to fly Kyle Jamieson to Bengaluru as cover for Saturday’s game against Pakistan.Cricket is not football, and the existence of substitutions clearly demands a bigger squad in one than the other. But with several teams in India experiencing an availability crisis – Australia are picking from a squad of 13 against England on Saturday – it is time for the ICC to discuss the 15-man limit on squads at world events.Related

  • Pluck or luck: New Zealand trust in the 'Kiwi' way

  • Iftikhar Ahmed, a man primed to beat New Zealand at their own game

  • New Zealand wait on injured players ahead of high-stakes contest against Pakistan

  • Maxwell to miss England match after suffering concussion in golf accident

  • Matt Henry joins New Zealand's mounting injury list; Jamieson called in as cover

The issue was not raised internally at the ICC in the build-up to the World Cup but teams can propose a change via the men’s cricket committee – which incidentally, Gary Stead, New Zealand’s coach, sits on – or the chief executives’ committee. It is time they do so, because the current level is needlessly strict.New Zealand have been affected worse than most teams by injuries and left themselves open to the possibility of an availability crisis when they retained Kane Williamson in their squad despite his fractured thumb. But their scramble to find 11 fit players is a direct function of the tight cap on squad numbers.”15 men is not enough,” Steve Harmison said on ESPNcricinfo’s Matchday show. “There’s a lot of teams now having injuries at this time – and they’re all muscle injuries. There’s a lot of muscle injuries because you play, you travel, you play… it’s not easy getting around India for nine games in this space of time.”The overall impact is to damage the quality of the game: players are selected even if they are not fully fit due to the lack of viable alternatives, and teams are forced to rebalance their sides in the event of injury, even if they may not want to. It is a situation that suits nobody.Kane Williamson fractured his thumb against Bangladesh•ICC/GettyThere is a skill in selecting a squad versatile enough to overcome multiple injuries – but players can become unavailable at any time for any reason, as Australia’s absentees this week have shown: if Glenn Maxwell’s freak concussion was avoidable, then Mitchell Marsh’s return home for family reasons was clearly not.Another drawback is that selecting first-choice players who are carrying injuries – as Australia and New Zealand did with Travis Head and Williamson – becomes much more of a gamble than it should be. If the aim is to ensure the best players are involved, an extra two or three spots in a squad would help achieve that.The principal argument against bigger squads is financial. Under current regulations, the ICC funds travel, accommodation and expenses for 15 squad members and eight support staff, with teams left to foot the bill in the event that they wish to bring travelling reserves or additional staff – as many do.For most boards, the additional expenditure is nothing more than a rounding error on their balance sheet, but consider the Netherlands. Their travelling reserves, Noah Croes and Kyle Klein, have flown economy class and shared twin rooms throughout the World Cup, at a combined expense of around €22,000 across six weeks; according to the KNCB, that is more than the total cost of a short ‘A’ team tour to England.In theory, smaller squads should help competitive balance, denying the best teams the opportunity to use their depth. In practice, smaller teams are affected just as badly: Sri Lanka have carried – and paid for – travelling reserves, and have used more players in the tournament than anyone else.The 15-man cap has been constant since the 1999 World Cup despite fundamental changes to the sport and the format. There has been a marked shift in the physical demands on players, the athleticism that 50-over cricket requires and the tournament lasts significantly longer.There is also scope for more flexibility within a seven-week tournament for players to come in and out of squads. If the ICC insist on keeping the cap at 15, there should be reasonable scope for teams to replace players for a set period: if Henry is ruled out for the next week, why shouldn’t Jamieson be able to join the squad as cover for two games?At one stage of their defeat to South Africa on Wednesday, New Zealand only had 11 players fit enough to field; the same could be true for them against Pakistan this weekend. Their plight should be enough to prompt change.

'Want to play the 2024 T20 World Cup' – Vlaeminck ready to relaunch injury-hit career

Having missed both the 2020 T20 World Cup and the 2022 ODI World Cup, she has set her sights on the upcoming world tournament

Andrew McGlashan12-Mar-2024Tayla Vlaeminck made her debut for Australia in October 2018. In the five-and-a-half years since she has made just 24 appearances and very little, if any of it, has been down to form. Her run of injuries, and the heartbreak of missing multiple World Cups, would test the belief of anyone.Later this month, she will try again to relaunch her international career having been recalled for Australia’s tour of Bangladesh. It comes shortly after another six months on the sidelines with a shoulder injury picked up in England last year. That followed multiple setbacks with stress fractures of her foot which first forced her out of the 2020 T20 World Cup on home soil with a recurrence then keeping her out of the 2022 ODI World Cup, 2022 Commonwealth Games and 2023 T20 World Cup. And even before she debuted for Australia she had undergone two ACL reconstructions.Ahead of flying out on Saturday, Vlaeminck admitted that while returning to Australia colours was always a motivation, there were times in the depth of her rehab that she wasn’t so much training for herself, as for those putting in the hours in to help her.Related

  • 'She's a real fighter' – Nitschke praises Jonassen's response to axing

  • Tayla Vlaeminck's road back: ballet dancers to bowling bouncers

“I’ve always had the overarching goal of getting back to play for Australia but at different times over the last few years it has wavered…the motivation has always been different, it hasn’t always been there, I suppose, but this will make it all worth it,” she told ESPNcricinfo.”In the lower moments it’s probably just been the people [around me] to be honest. Even to the extent of rocking up to training some days knowing our S&C [strength and conditioning coach] is so invested the whole time, has put a session together and come in early to get it done. It’s those little things, you want to do the session for them more so than yourself sometimes.”I’ve been really lucky, had a heap of really good people around Victoria who have helped me through. Without that sort of help not sure the motivation would always have been there.”Vlaeminck returned during the WNCL in mid-January, playing five matches in the latter part of Victoria’s campaign where she claimed four wickets. Last week she was part of the Green vs Gold three-day game in Adelaide – the first time she had bowled with a red-ball since the 2019 Ashes.Now, though, the focus returns firmly to the white ball with another T20 World Cup to aim for later in the year. “I want to play in that World Cup, it’s one of things that has kept me going,” she said.Having twice returned from stress fractures of her foot – with the Australian ballet playing a part in her recovery – the latest setback was a different one, although something she knew was lurking around the corner having initially dislocated her left shoulder playing for Victoria in the 2017-18 season and it remained vulnerable to popping out of the joint. During the A tour of England last year, which ran concurrently with the Ashes, it dislocated while bowling and Vlaeminck knew she had to get it properly fixed.”While it was annoying as I’d just come back, and it was another six months [out], it probably wasn’t as hard to deal with knowing that it hadn’t come out of the blue,” she said.Tayla Vlaeminck on her remodelled action: “Hopefully with some more time getting used to the action and the run-up I can get even quicker”•Getty ImagesBefore her latest rehab, Vlaeminck had already done significant work remodeling her action to try and avoid a repeat of the stress fractures in her foot. She remains confident that her pace has not been impacted and believes she is getting back to her peak with more to come.”It’s something I wasn’t so much worried about but considered as I changed my action,” she said. “I want to be on the pitch as much as possible but don’t want to compromise losing 10kph. I’m really confident with where it’s at now, probably a similar level to what it was beforehand. Hopefully with some more time getting used to the action and the run-up I can get even quicker.””It’s is something I’ll have to manage for the rest of my career. When you’ve been bowling a certain way for seven or eight years that’s obviously difficult to change, so making sure it doesn’t slip back into bad habits in the competitive environment of a game. [But] once it gets to game day I don’t think about it too much.”She tries not to get too wrapped up in what other quick bowlers are pushing the speed gun to, although admitted it’s sometimes difficult. “I am quite a competitive person so like to try and bowl as fast as I can…think it [the number of quicks] is really good for the game,” she said. “We’ve got Milly Illingworth at Victoria and it’s always fun when you are stood at square leg watching her run in and that sort of thing always gets me a bit up and about.”The tour of Bangladesh also brings her back together for Australia with close friends Georgia Wareham and Sophie Molineux. The trio watched the 2022 ODI World Cup final together when they were all injured.”I remember that day, probably wasn’t one of the best,” Vlaeminck said. “We’ve been through a lot together, grown up together, and all helped each other along the way. If we all got to play together in Bangladesh it would be pretty special.”For starters, though, being on the plane is enough. “Just want this week to go pretty quickly to be honest. I’ll be happy if I get on the pitch at all. Just getting over there and training with the girls again will be really fun.”

Stoinis makes highest score in an IPL chase as LSG score record win in Chennai

Stats highlights from LSG’s six-wicket victory after chasing down 211 against CSK

Sampath Bandarupalli23-Apr-20242:00

Why did CSK send Jadeja in ahead of Dube?

124* Marcus Stoinis’ score against CSK in Chennai is the highest individual score in a chase in the IPL. He surpassed Paul Valthaty’s 120 not out for Punjab against CSK in Mohali in IPL 2011. Stoinis also went past Virender Sehwag for the highest individual score against CSK in the IPL.211 The target achieved by LSG is the highest successful chase in Chennai, beating the 206 by CSK against RCB in 2012.3 Number of successful 200-plus chases by LSG. Only one team has chased down a higher target against CSK – 219 by Mumbai Indians in IPL 2021.113 Runs needed by LSG in the last eight overs. Only one team had scored more runs in the last eight overs (13-20) of a chase in the IPL – 125 by Mumbai Indians against CSK in IPL 2021.4 Centuries scored by Ruturaj Gaikwad in defeats. Only Chris Gayle has more T20 hundreds in matches his team has lost. Virat Kohli (3), Hashim Amla (2) and Sanju Samson (2) are the other batters with multiple IPL tons in defeats.17 Runs needed by LSG in the last over, the most successfully chased against CSK in the IPL. Delhi Capitals chased 17 in the final over against CSK in 2020.5 Instances of batters from both teams scoring hundreds in an IPL match. All five have come since the start of IPL 2023 and three of them occurred in this season.

Bangladesh's chance to build on Rawalpindi miracle

Previous away wins in Test cricket have only led to false dawns but perhaps this one could lead to solid gains

Mohammad Isam29-Aug-2024Sport lends itself to miracles, it’s part of why people love it. Bangladesh beating a higher-ranked Test team away from home grabs headlines, but because of their overall inconsistency, they never seem to justify those victories. Their rare wins abroad have always felt like false dawns. Even when they beat New Zealand in 2022, Bangladesh couldn’t follow it up. Not later in the series. Not even later in the year. So when they beat Pakistan by ten wickets in Rawalpindi last weekend, it was déjà vu all over again, as American baseball player and coach Yogi Berra liked to say.Only Bangladesh can stop this cycle from repeating, and in Rawalpindi, as they were outclassing the hosts, there were plenty of signs that it is possible. Their tactics stood out. They had a better understanding of the conditions. They still stuck to their usual way of playing Test cricket – for better or worse – especially against better teams. Start by avoiding defeat. Then look for a draw. Finally once that safety net is secure, push for the win.Rawalpindi followed this method to a tee, but it also included moments where Bangladesh put the opposition on the mat, like in the first session itself. They had Pakistan at 16 for 3, before the home side recovered. There was also a spell of play in their batting innings when Litton Das went after Naseem Shah. That seemed to deflate Pakistan, who, by then, had been on the field for ages and ages.Related

  • The champion cricketer is back – whither Shakib, the Bangladesh hero?

  • Nahid's rise gives Bangladesh a happy selection headache

  • Pakistan in a firefight as Bangladesh push for historic series win

Pakistan are under pressure as they confront the possibility of perhaps even losing the series now. Heavy rain could see off the first two days in the second Test, also in Rawalpindi. The forecast improves from there on, but not by much. Bangladesh coach Chandika Hathurusinghe knows he is in the box seat, but took the high road when asked about it.”We don’t get satisfied or joyful at their [Pakistan’s] misery,” he said. “It is about us, how we want to perform. We get a lot of confidence in the way we stuck to our game plan.”Bangladesh don’t experiment too much with their Test XI. They have two of the best spinners in the world – Shakib Al Hasan and Mehidy Hasan Miraz, with the former a genuine allrounder, and the latter being someone who can bat quite well. It allows Bangladesh to have batting till No. 8, and still play with five frontline bowlers.Test teams are always looking for such wealth. Hathurusinghe said they knew that the spinners would come into play in the first Test despite the pitch looking very green at the start of the game, if they could get into the fifth day.”We always wanted to go with that line-up,” he said. “We knew with the heat around, this wicket wasn’t going to be favourable for fast bowlers for all five days. We knew that our spinners are coming into the game, but for that we needed to drag it into the fifth day.”There could, however, be one change in the Bangladesh line-up for the second Test. The pitch, when it came out from under the covers briefly, looked like it had a lot of grass on it. “[Taskin Ahmed] has a very good chance of playing,” Hathurusinghe said, “because of the type of pitch and weather conditions. It is little more favourable for fast bowlers.”While Bangladesh stick to their templated line-up, Pakistan have had to change personnel. There’s a feeling around the Test match that Shaheen Afridi’s demotion to the bench is a result of Bangladesh playing him out quite comfortably.Without gloating, Bangladesh understand that they have the upper hand here. They are not going into Friday’s game with an underdog mentality. They will look for ways to attack Pakistan, but will always be aware that losing is not an option.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus